Nike 
For more apparel sector analysis and earnings breakdowns, visit our Market Insights hub.
Market Capitalization and Scale
Nike and Lululemon operate at dramatically different scales in the athletic apparel industry. As of late July 2026, Nike commands a market cap of $61.74 billion, making it one of the largest consumer discretionary stocks globally. Lululemon, while substantial at $13.47 billion, represents roughly one-fifth of Nike's market valuation.
| Metric | Nike (NKE) | Lululemon (LULU) |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $61.74 billion | $13.47 billion |
| Share Price | $41.72 | $118.60 |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.48 billion | 113.55 million |
| Float | 1.18 billion | 98.22 million |
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 27.45 | 8.94 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.33 | 1.21 |
Nike's $41.72 share price reflects a significant decline from its 52-week high of $54.22, down approximately 22% from recent highs. Lululemon has experienced similar pressure, trading near its 52-week low of $104.44 after declining 26% over the trailing 90 days.
Recent Stock Performance
Both athletic apparel leaders have faced substantial headwinds in 2026, declining significantly from their 52-week highs as consumer discretionary stocks fell out of favor with investors.
{
"type": "price_line",
"chart_kind": "price_line",
"symbol": "NKE,LULU",
"symbols": ["NKE", "LULU"],
"title": "NKE vs LULU: 90-Day Stock Price Performance",
"subtitle": "March 24 - July 31, 2026",
"timespan": "day",
"xKey": "label",
"yFormat": "currency",
"source": "Vantafin market data"
}The chart illustrates how both stocks moved lower in tandem over the 90-day period, with NKE declining from $53.49 to $41.71 and LULU falling from $160.95 to $118.87. The synchronized decline reflects broader consumer sector concerns rather than company-specific issues.
Nike's decline has been particularly painful for long-term shareholders, with the stock losing roughly 36% year-to-date through mid-2026, according to recent market coverage. Lululemon has faced similar pressure, with analysts noting the stock declined approximately 45% year-to-date as of early July.
Revenue Comparison
Nike generates revenue at a scale Lululemon has not yet approached. In the most recent quarter, Nike reported $11.28 billion in Q3 FY2026 revenue, with fiscal year 2026 total revenue reaching approximately $46.52 billion. Lululemon's trailing twelve-month revenue stands at $11.10 billion, meaning NKE generates roughly four times more revenue than LULU.
Despite the scale difference, Lululemon has demonstrated stronger recent earnings beats. In its most recent reported quarter, Nike beat estimates with EPS of $0.72 versus the $0.11 estimate and revenue of $10.97 billion versus $10.85 billion expected. Lululemon similarly beat expectations with EPS of $1.69 versus $1.67 estimated and revenue of $2.47 billion versus $2.44 billion expected.
The revenue mix differs substantially between the two companies. Nike generates approximately 66% of revenue from footwear, with apparel contributing $15.72 billion annually. Lululemon remains heavily concentrated in women's athleisure apparel, which generated $7.00 billion in FY2025, representing roughly 65% of the company's total revenue.
Profitability and Margins
Lululemon demonstrates substantially superior profitability metrics on a percentage basis. The company's TTM net margin of 14.22% compares favorably to Nike's 4.84% net margin, reflecting LULU's premium brand positioning and efficient direct-to-consumer distribution model.
| Metric | Nike (NKE) | Lululemon (LULU) |
|---|---|---|
| TTM Net Margin | 4.84% | 14.22% |
| TTM EPS | $1.52 | $13.27 |
| TTM Net Income | $2.25 billion | $1.58 billion |
| Gross Margin (Recent Quarter) | ~40% | ~55% |
Despite higher margins, Lululemon's smaller scale means it generates less absolute net income than Nike. NKE's $2.25 billion in TTM net income still exceeds LULU's $1.58 billion despite the margin disadvantage. However, LULU's $13.27 TTM EPS significantly exceeds NKE's $1.52, reflecting LULU's smaller share count and higher per-share profitability.
Valuation Analysis
The valuation comparison presents an interesting contrast. Lululemon trades at a remarkably low P/E ratio of 8.94 TTM, while Nike's P/E of 27.45 appears expensive by comparison. However, the P/E differential reflects fundamental differences in business quality, growth expectations, and the companies' competitive positions.
Nike's premium valuation partly reflects its dividend, which provides income to shareholders. Lululemon does not pay a dividend, instead reinvesting cash flows into growth initiatives and share repurchases.
On a price-to-sales basis, both companies trade at similar valuations, with NKE at 1.33x and LULU at 1.21x. The similar P/S ratios despite dramatically different margins suggest the market is pricing in different growth trajectories for each company.
Strategic Positioning
Nike has dominated the athletic footwear market for decades, but the company faces mounting challenges in 2026. Recent news coverage highlights brand perception issues, particularly in China, where Nike is cutting off thousands of unauthorized online distributors to tighten its digital footprint. The company has struggled with inventory management and discounting that has pressured margins.
Analysts covering Nike have noted the stock has lost 36% in the first half of 2026, with concerns about the innovation pipeline and whether new products can reignite demand. The company is working to streamline its distribution in China after tackling discount-related challenges in the market.
Lululemon has taken a different path, concentrating on premium positioning and direct-to-consumer sales. The company continues expanding its product categories beyond yoga and athletic wear into lifestyle apparel. Recent ESG initiatives include a $30 million Series A investment in Syntetica, a nylon recycling startup, reflecting broader sustainability commitments.
Despite Lululemon's margin advantages, analysts have noted the stock declined 45% year-to-date as macro weakness affecting consumer discretionary spending weighs on the shares. Seeking Alpha upgraded the stock in July 2026, arguing that the decline reflects temporary macro factors rather than permanent competitive deterioration.
Bottom Line: NKE vs LULU
Nike and Lululemon offer distinct investment profiles for 2026.
Choose Nike if you want:
- Exposure to global athletic footwear dominance
- Dividend income from a consumer staples-like holding
- Turnaround potential as management addresses brand and distribution challenges
- Scale and liquidity in a large-cap consumer stock
Choose Lululemon if you want:
- Superior profitability and margins (14%+ net margin vs 5%)
- Lower valuation entry point (P/E of 8.94 vs 27.45)
- Premium brand positioning in growing athleisure categories
- Higher per-share earnings ($13.27 TTM EPS)
Nike's larger scale and dividend make it suitable for income-oriented investors seeking consumer exposure, while Lululemon's margin advantage and attractive P/E ratio appeal to value-oriented investors willing to accept higher volatility. Both stocks have underperformed significantly in 2026, and investors should weigh whether the current challenges represent temporary headwinds or structural competitive threats before establishing positions.
For ongoing coverage of both companies, track NKE and LULU in your Vantafin watchlist and monitor upcoming earnings dates. Nike is scheduled to report next on September 29, 2026, while Lululemon is expected to release results around September 3, 2026.